|
HOME
Black & White
Paintings gallery
Exhibitions
Critics
Bibliography
Links
Contacts |
Leonardo Sciascia
I have been following
Tranchino’s work for more than twenty years, ever since, I remember not
in what newspaper or for what exibition, I saw a reproduction of a
picture of his, and, happening to be in Siracusa, with Dominique
Fernandez – who then used to spend her summers in a little house by the
sea at Pachino – we went along to his studio. Work, I am here using the
word improperly, in a manner of speaking: Tranchino, à la Stendhal, à la
Savinio, does not work (and I recall a memorable page by Savinio,
introducing a collection of lithographs by Fabrizio Clerici),he enjoys
himself, that is to say, he paints with delight, with pleasure, as on a
prolonged vacation – so very prolonged -, continuous and intense enough
to absorb his whole life. And perhaps precisely from this stems the
attention, the association, the friendship that binds us: from our
reciprocal recognition of each other as amateurs, ones who work with
love and delight, precisely in the sense used by Savinio regarding
Clerici. And it is not that working with delight excludes the spadework,
the research, the anguish and the travail, looking inside oneself at
times with dismay, and looking outside with prehensile attention and at
times avidly: but in a sphere, always, of “enjoyment”, of an
existential game. A game in which a large part is played by the memory,
its transmutation or change into myth, into fable: being aware of the
present, and also of destiny; and like this running over the images, the
metaphors, the emblems, from Homer to Conrad,with certain Borgesian
glosses.
Born in Siracusa in 1938,
Tranchino has never been away except for very short periods, to attend
his exhibitions or to see those of other artists whom he find congenial,
in Italy and abroad. I believe his longest stay away was in Paris, to
learn the technique of aquafortis, a means of expression that
increasingly attracts him (and we should also note, in the last few
years, the greater intensity of his drawing, a stronger element of
design in his painting).
Oeininger said that you can be
born and you can die, but you cannot live, in Siracusa. He was thinking,
perhaps, of Platen, who went to die there. But Tranchino not only lives
there serenely, but relives its distant myths (which at times appear as
“citations” of De Chirico, of Savinio) and those of childhood: between
the sea and the countryside, in the exhumed splendour of an incomparable
civilization.
Translated by Peter
Glendening
BACK

Claude AMBROISE
THE ISLAND NEVER LEFT
What is the purpose of leaving,
even on one of those ships as ever tied up along the dock, almost an
invitation to travel? Sicily can become unbearable. So much so that at
some point, not long ago, in the mind and in the very body of the
painter Tranchino, the earthquake reasserted itself: a kind of seismic
ghost on the canvases of his studio on Siracusa’s Mastra Rua. Not that
his is some natural or architectonic world, destroyed along with the
orthogonal law that supported it, a declaration of chaos; but the forms
of his paintings seem born out of deep, tectonic forces, in the
suspension of unbalanced balconies or walls of a garden, dwarf palms and
broken columns, a man haunted by a book, interstitial patches of colour,
that house, these landings...
Inside every Sicilian is the
experience of the earthquake, even if it is only atavistic. As in Enzo
Consolo’s books in which the catastrophe is narrated through metaphor.
Had such a catastrophe not occurred in language too, and early on, we
would not now be drawn to “Il sorriso dell’ignoto marinaio” and other
tales. Something similar has happened in the paintings of Tranchino,
where telluric forces have set him free, indeed surrealistically, from
the preestablished harmony of the world.
Following the earthquake it is
normal to rebuild from scratch, but many of the pictures of the
Siracusan painter refuse this Sisyphean labour; they propose instead a
different world from the one gone before, one in which the relation
between colours and objects has been reinvented, the relationship of
objects to one another, the very configuration of space... This was
especially the case in his work of some years ago.
Even today his audience
continues to be provoked by this experience of the earthquake. The
barrier of naturalism will not be restored: there is the dissociation
between compound forms and colours, the light taking its origins from
the South, but the canvas changes under the chill rays of sunlight which
cross it, revealing a vegetal recess: the objects, even those on a large
scale, often derive from toys recovered from his childhood. Except that
the meanings have been rigorously individualised, not simply juxtaposed,
created through combination and interstitial spacing, like the telling
elements of an ancient tale. These are Tranchino’s signifiers, the
signifiers of his journey: the dreaming traveller who does not leave his
island but paints the world and its objects, which in turn refer to him,
revealing him as they also reveal the one who views and is captivated by
their charm.
Just as Van Gogh’s boots were
emblems for the Dutch painter, the boats, the car, the tail of a plane -
and not least the colours used to depict them - point towards Tranchino
the man. His boat is a captured object in the arms of the harbour, his
car a capturing object whose windscreen retains an ellipse of the
landscape, his little dog questions the pictures and jumps about inside
of them, the columns and the plants rise up, the rounded banisters
indicate a turning... On the dock or in the garden there is a man, often
reading, on one occasion writing; at any moment he may become distracted
from his reading, with his back to the sea, or perhaps may catch a
glimpse of it, attracted by the distant, shaded view that finds him
through the foliage.
Tranchino the man lives in
Siracusa, and Siracusa is a port, an invitation to the open sea and
travel, but the painter will not embark on a voyage around the world.
Instead he resembles the character of many of his paintings, the
sleeping man in the comfortable dressing-gown who points towards the
road and the racing-car: in a dream. The painter of the Mastra Rua is a
man who reads stories of inner journeys, adventures, like those of his
paintings, even as his own elected places are the walk along the city’s
marina or a garden from which he can just make out the sea. If he
drives, it is to grasp the landscape. His paintings stop short of the
physical journey, preferring instead to reach for the emblem and enjoy
it sensually in the confines of shapes and colours arrived at in his
studio.
The world is revealed in the
picture: to you, the spectator who, now it is accomplished, may regard
the very essence of relationships which envelop mystery or conceal fear,
amazement, longing... Then you don’t any longer know whether these
relationships belong to the artist or to yourself. The painter says that
his picture, each of his pictures, is a navigation: perhaps in this way
it is like a book, whether one reads or writes it, as the discovery is
made in the process. When he approaches his easel, Tranchino does not
know beforehand what his picture is going to be, discovering and
inventing it step by step, as if it were, precisely, a journey.
Translated by Pat Boran
BACK

Ferdinando SCIANNA
A WORLD “AS IT COULD BE
Very rarely, in my opinion, do
we straight away articulate a critical response to the work of an
artist. Unless of course one is a professional critic. Usually we react
emotionally, with pleasure, with indifference, sometimes perhaps with
irritation. More seldom still do we begin to rationalise if the work is
that of a friend.
Gaetano Tranchino is an
extraordinary artist and he is also my good friend. He, however, lives
in Siracusa while I live in Milan. I see his pictures in his studio when
I go to visit him, and sometimes, between one visit and the next, whole
months have passed. Looking at the pictures is, for me, part of a ritual
of friendship, charged with emotion, with feelings that form an
important part of our mutual understanding, as people who have known
each other a long time. Certainly I am not concerned on these occasions
with formulating a critical response to his work. This response will
develop afterwards, gradually, perhaps suggested by something I’ve read,
with which the pictures apparently have nothing in common, in the course
of subsequent conversations about our individual work or about things
that have more to do with life than with the arts of painting and
photography.
About Giorgio de Chirico, whom
he admired very much, Renè Magritte has written that his revolution
consisted of the fact that “breaking with all that had been done up to
that moment, he started to paint the world not as it is, nor as he saw
it, but as it could be, as it should be.” To me this seems an
extraordinary, lucid compliment. When I read this judgement, immediately
I felt that this sentence corresponded more than any critically
elaborated thought of my own to the sentiments that arise within me when
I stand in front of Gaetano Tranchino’s painting.
Tranchino too creates images of
a world “as it could be, as it should be”.
What I’m trying to say, to
understand first of all for myself, is that I don’t think the three
criteria of imagination, dream and vision are alone enough to explain
Tranchino’s paintings — and maybe it would be no use. My strongest
feeling, and one I find renewed with each viewing, especially of the
most recent phase of his work, is that of finding myself in front of
images of persuasive truth, representations of a world which seems all
the more real for being made up of unreal images. A world, in fact, not
dreamt, not the result of imagination, or artistic vision as we might
say. On the contrary, a world that imposes itself as it should be, with
the existence that it could have.
Tranchino is deeply rooted on
his island, in fact on Ortigia, the island off the island. Nevertheless,
maybe it is because of this virtual taking root that the world he
describes to us is universal. His cultural dialogue is not, for that
matter, particularly Sicilian.
Certainly, if you know Gaetano,
you can find evidence in these images pointing to several elements of
his personal life, of his being both timelessly Siracusan, of Siracusa
timelessness.
The cars, the familiar now
stormy now becalmed sea, sometimes surrounding peninsulas, tables,
wardrobes. These wardrobes are armed with mirrors that often reflect
images different to what stands in front of them. Pieces of archaeology,
columns, huge ships from which flourish smoke made of stone, gardens in
the middle of which sit men who read, write, who seem to be listening to
music, small dogs, the slender figures of girls appearing and
disappearing between the palms.
Fragments of real experience,
certainly, which belong to Tranchino’s own memory but of which we have
the impression that they have emerged from the consciousness of the
painter to head off on their own and unexpectedly compose a whole new
world, different and autonomous, a world with its own time and space, a
world of unknown geographies, with shapes and colours never seen and
obeying other laws of rest and motion. This world, this universe
conjured by the painter — who, we might say, is the only one to have the
right to see it, living inside of it — represented, reaffirming its own
reality through the mystery of the painting in order that we, too, can
get to know its existence, to enjoy its necessary beauty.
Once encountered, this universe
reveals itself unambiguously. We recognise for ever after these images
as, unmistakable, the paintings of Gaetano Tranchino. Perhaps this is
the mystery of painting and style, difficult and often ambiguous words
which here seem to prove themselves.
A precise, poetic universe
which, through an artist, finds the exact form of its existence, in
order to enter into and become a part of our lives.
Translated by Pat Boran
BACK

Aidan DUNNE
REVIEW OF THE PLACE
OF MEMORY BY GAETANO TRANCHINO AT RUA/RED IN TALLAGHT
(the irish times, may 5, 2010)
Gaetano Tranchino’s paintings
in The Place
of Memory at
RUA Red Gallery in Tallaght, have a dreamy, magical quality to them.
They are pictorial fables, opening up a narrative space that is warm and
nostalgic without being at all overly sweet. There is a distinctly
Mediterranean feeling to the world they evoke, which is hardly
surprising given that Tranchino is from Syracuse on the south-eastern
coast of Sicily, a place steeped in classical history.
In his work it’s a beautiful realm. Recurrent
motifs include the lush, well tended garden, the comfortable,
accommodating house, remnants of antiquity in the form of stone carvings
or pillars, the road and the gate, the sea and the land. All of these
elements frame accounts of arrivals and departures, via bicycle, car and
sailing boat or liner. Our view of events is usually oblique and
fragmentary: we glimpse a bicycle rounding a corner, the hind quarters
of a dog, its tail wagging, a car making its way through the night, a
ship pulling away from the dock. A man stands, hands in pockets, looking
into the evening light, as though awaiting someone.
The curvilinear shapes suggest travel. Most of what
we see, including ships and cars, has a retrospective look. The work
invites comparison with that of Simon English, who seems to share many
of Tranchino’s concerns. But while English likes drastically toned down
colours and modulated shades of grey, Tranchino embraces colour with all
the verve of David Hockney.
He uses intense yellows, pinks,
reds, greens and blues in richly textured, jewel-like masses, often
accentuated by strong tonal contrasts. If he wasn’t such a good painter
it could all go horribly wrong, but he is actually a fine, sensitive
painter, and the paintings are not only attractive but capable of
withstanding sustained attention: they’d be good to live with, in other
words. Tranchino’s place of memory is tinged with the sadness of loss,
but as formulated, it’s an almost pleasurable sadness.
BACK

Pat BORAN
THE PLACE OF MEMORY
All true art is a kind of
haunting, first for the artist, then for its wider audience. Like the
writer who returns to the empty page, the painter who faces the blank
canvas, day after day and year after year, inevitably finds that the
process of filling that space—or of carefully brushing away the
obscuring dust, as might be more appropriate description, given the
archaeologically rich Sicilian landscape—reveals images that echo and
amplify each other across great stretches of time.
Gaetano Tranchino’s paintings, though they appear to record or replay
specific personal moments and events from the past cannot be called
nostalgic or even merely personal, for the moments they describe—the
recent departure of a girl, or man, or dog, the arrival of yet another
smoke-scarfed ship into port—may be said to be as old as life on the
Mediterranean island itself. The artist who goes after personal
emotions, it would seem, is soon confronted with eternal questions and
truths.
For Tranchino, unlike many artists of his generation, the haunting at
the heart of his work is connected with the persistence of love, of
affection, of mystery and of memory itself. In this sense, and on that
often deeply troubled island, his work is celebratory, poetic and
ultimately life affirming. The vibrant colours and sensuous forms, the
inviting perspective and humanizing presences of his trade-mark figures
(the reader, the thinker, the dog-walker, the dreamer) all suggest an
enviable and all-too-rare contentment.
Though he might laugh at the notion, there is in his work if not quite a
religious impulse then certainly a ‘sacredizing’ one, an impulse which
makes something special and numinous of an old gateway, of the palm tree
leaning over it, of a half-eroded Doric column on a hillside or the
tree-lined pier which reaches out to protect an approaching ship.
For a painter who is so often drawn to modes of travel (1950s
automobiles, almost comically primitive aeroplanes, etc), Tranchino's
work itself might be said to be a kind of time travel. The hillsides of
south-eastern Sicily, dotted with Greek, Roman and Baroque ruins make
almost impossible a simple chronological reading of the landscape.
Rather than ask the question ‘Who has been here?’ it might be simpler to
ask ‘Who has not?’
To paint in Sicily, then, is to be aware of the fleeting nature of time,
the rise and fall of so many empires, and, paradoxically, of the
enduring power of art to place a single gesture or brushstroke before
the eyes of generations. To paint in Sicily is to work with a pallet of
colours few northern Europeans may wield with the same casual
confidence, or the same mediated feeling.
At once haunting and life affirming, Gaetano Tranchino’s paintings are
also undoubtedly beautiful. One is put in mind of Sicily’s most famous
modern writer, the late Leonardo Sciascia (a close friend, as it
happens), who in a well-known short story* has one of his characters
praise the Sicilian landscape for “a beauty so obvious that it would
dazzle even an idiot”. The same can be said with confidence of
Tranchino’s work which makes even those who have never been to his
homeland wish to go there again.
*from the short story ‘The Wine-Dark Sea’
BACK
|
|